Comparison between Redken Extreme Strengthening Shampoo vs. Pureology Hydrate Shampoo
Find out which product is better for your skin.
34 Ingredients 66
1
Water
1
Water
2
Sodium Laureth Sulfate
2
Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
3
Coco-Betaine
3
Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate
4
Glycol Distearate
4
Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate
5
Sodium Chloride
5
Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate
6
Dimethicone
6
Cocamidopropyl Betaine
7
Fragrance
7
Glycol Distearate
8
Cocamide Mipa
8
Glycereth-26
-- Show others --
Uniqueness18 out of 34
52.9%
Uniqueness50 out of 66
75.8%
Positive Effects
Find out what good effects the product has
ECO Metrics
Find out how eco-friendly the components are
Vegan
No
No
Cruelty free
No
No
Reef friendly
Yes
Yes
Ozone layer safe
Yes
Yes
Organic score
natural
6 out of 34
18%
chemical
26 out of 34
76%
natural
16 out of 66
24%
chemical
45 out of 66
68%
Concerns
Pay attention to these components
-- Extra information --
Components by Skin Type
Find out what components are good or bad for your skin type
Dry skin
Positive: 1Negative: 1
Propylene Glycol#21Sodium Laureth Sulfate#2
Oily skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Salicylic Acid#11
Sensitive skin
Positive: 0Negative: 4
Salicylic Acid#11Benzyl Benzoate#19Limonene#22Linalool#27
Dry skin
Positive: 5Negative: 0
Propylene Glycol#19Glycerin#26Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C)#55Butylene Glycol#56Tocopherol#63
Oily skin
Positive: 2Negative: 0
Salicylic Acid#37Camellia Sinensis (Green Tea) Leaf Extract#58
Sensitive skin
Positive: 0Negative: 6
Linalool#22Benzoic Acid#24Limonene#27Salicylic Acid#37Isopropyl Alcohol#41Citric Acid#49
Detailed view
Redken Extreme Strengthening Shampoo vs. Pureology Hydrate Shampoo
Position 1
Both products have the same component on this position.
#1Water
Origin: natural
Role: Solvent
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
Water is a great solvent. It’s neutral and doesn’t provide any strong positive or negative effects. It just helps components to mix better and to transport active components.
Position 2
#2Sodium Laureth Sulfate
Origin: chemical
Role: Cleansing agent, Emulsifying agent, Surfactant
Cleansing
Sulfates
Comedogenic rating [ 3 ]
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
![Bad for dry skin](https://skinsignal.com/api/web/image/layout/dry_bad.png?w=30&q=50)
Bad for dry skin
-- versus --
#2Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
Origin: natural
Role: Cleansing agent, Hair conditioning, Surfactant
Cleansing
Malassezia unsafe
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ B ]
Position 3
#3Coco-Betaine
Origin: chemical
Role: Skin conditioning agent, Antistatic agent, Cleansing agent, Foam booster, Hair conditioning, Surfactant, Viscosity controlling agent
Cleansing
Antiseptic
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ B ]
-- versus --
#3Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate
Origin: chemical
Role: Cleansing agent, Foam booster, Foaming, Surfactant
Cleansing
EWG Rating [ 2 ]
CIR Rating [ B ]
Position 4
#4Glycol Distearate
Origin: chemical
Role: Skin conditioning agent, Emollient, Emulsifying agent, Viscosity controlling agent
Softening
Malassezia unsafe
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ A ]
-- versus --
#4Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate
Origin: chemical
Role: Cleansing agent, Foaming, Surfactant
Sulfates
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ A ]
Position 5
#5Sodium Chloride
Origin: natural
Role: Flavoring agent, Viscosity controlling agent
Antiseptic
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
Sodium Chloride is a very famous ingredeint also known as Salt. Yes, it’s the same salt you can find on your table. In cosmetics, it is used as a preservative helping the product to live longer. It is also used as a peeling agent in different scrubs. Human contact with this element since ancient times and that's why it is 100% safe.
-- versus --
#5Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate
Origin: chemical
Role: Skin conditioning agent, Antistatic agent, Cleansing agent, Emulsifying agent, Foaming, Hair conditioning, Surfactant, Viscosity controlling agent
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ B ]