Dupes for LilyAna Naturals Vitamin C Serum

We have found 257 dupes for LilyAna Naturals Vitamin C Serum in composition and properties. They also contain Water, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer.

Total found: 257

IMAGE Skincare

VITAL C Hydrating Anti-Aging Serum

79 components

Less Water Position 2 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 59 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 62 vs. 6

DermaQuest

Solar Moisturizer SPF 30

49 components

Much less Water Position 6 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 33 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 28 vs. 6

Murad

Environmental Shield Essential-C Cleanser

36 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 14 vs. 3

Less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 8 vs. 6

Natura Bissé

Diamond Instant Glow (12 Ampoules)

79 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 30 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 34 vs. 6

Murad

Vita-C Triple Exfoliating Facial

46 components

Less Water Position 3 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 15 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 35 vs. 6

111SKIN

Vitamin C Brightening Cleanser

42 components

Less Water Position 4 vs. 1

More Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 1 vs. 3

Less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 9 vs. 6

Peter Thomas Roth

Peptide 21 Wrinkle Resist Serum

56 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 29 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 38 vs. 6

IMAGE Skincare

Vital C Deluxe Hydrating Anti-Aging Serum

79 components

Less Water Position 2 vs. 1

Much less Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Position 59 vs. 3

Much less Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer Position 62 vs. 6