Dupes for Drunk Elephant Cocomino Glossing Shampoo

We have found 48 dupes for Drunk Elephant Cocomino Glossing Shampoo in composition and properties. They also contain , Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate.

Briogeo

Scalp Revival Charcoal Coconut Oil Micro-Exfoliating Shampoo

29 components

Same concentration of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 7 vs. 3

Less Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 9 vs. 5

R+Co

GEMSTONE Color Shampoo

48 components

Same concentration of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 27 vs. 3

Same concentration of Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 5 vs. 5

R+Co

Television Perfect Hair Shampoo

37 components

Same concentration of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 18 vs. 3

Same concentration of Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 5 vs. 5

VIRTUE

Recovery Shampoo

53 components

Less Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 3 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 5 vs. 3

Less Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 6 vs. 5

Oribe

Silverati Shampoo

90 components

Much less Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 7 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 53 vs. 3

More Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 5

Oribe

Gold Lust Repair Restore Shampoo Liter

87 components

Same concentration of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 50 vs. 3

More Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 3 vs. 5

Oribe

Hair Alchemy Resilience Shampoo

102 components

Less Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 3 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 42 vs. 3

More Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 5

Oribe

Gold Lust Shampoo Refill

87 components

Same concentration of Sodium Lauroyl Methyl Isethionate Position 2 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 50 vs. 3

More Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate Position 3 vs. 5

• «
• ‹
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• ›
• »