Dupes for Bamford Botanic Shampoo

We have found 330 dupes for Bamford Botanic Shampoo in composition and properties. They also contain Water, Sodium Laureth Sulfate, Cocamidopropyl Betaine.

Total found: 330

Philip B

Russian Amber Imperial Shampoo

58 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Much less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 8 vs. 3

Nioxin

System 2 Cleanser Shampoo For Natural Hair With Progressed Thinning

36 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 4 vs. 3

UNITE Hair

BLONDA Toning Shampoo

14 components

Very similar product!

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Same concentration of Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 3 vs. 3

René Furterer

Naturia Extra Gentle Shampoo

21 components

Very similar product!

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Same concentration of Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 3 vs. 3

Phyto

PHYTOCYANE Densifying Treatment Shampoo

27 components

Less Water Position 2 vs. 1

Less Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 3 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 4 vs. 3

Peter Thomas Roth

Mega-Rich Shampoo

24 components

Very similar product!

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Same concentration of Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 3 vs. 3

Philip B

Peppermint Avocado Shampoo

45 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 6 vs. 3

Nioxin

Cleanser Shampoo Hair Care System 1 For Natural Hair With Light Thinning

36 components

Same concentration of Water Position 1 vs. 1

Same concentration of Sodium Laureth Sulfate Position 2 vs. 2

Less Cocamidopropyl Betaine Position 4 vs. 3