Comparison between SkinCeuticals Physical Matte UV Defense SPF 50 vs. SkinCeuticals Physical Fusion UV Defense SPF 50
- 22 components -
- 38 components -
Find out which product is better for your skin.
Ingredients in both products 14
Components only in SkinCeuticals Physical Matte UV Defense SPF 50 8
Transparent Micronized Zinc Oxide (Z-Cote®), Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Hydrogenated Jojoba Oil, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Silica Silylate and 3 more. Show all.
Uniqueness: 36.4%
Components only in SkinCeuticals Physical Fusion UV Defense SPF 50 24
Uniqueness: 63.2%
Face to Face
Components position by position
1
Titanium Dioxide
1
Titanium Dioxide
2
Transparent Micronized Zinc Oxide (Z-Cote®)
2
Zinc Oxide
3
Dimethicone
3
Water
4
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
4
Dimethicone
5
Talc
5
Isododecane
6
Dicaprylyl Ether
6
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
7
Triethylhexanoin
7
Undecane
8
Isohexadecane
8
Triethylhexanoin
Show others
Positive Effects
Find out what good effects the product has
Both products provide the following effects: , UV Protection, Moisturizing, Cleansing, Softening, Protection, Hair conditioning
Effects unique for Physical Matte UV Defense SPF 50:
SoothingEffects unique for Physical Fusion UV Defense SPF 50:
Antioxidant, Anti-aging, Antiseptic, Regeneration-- Show more --
ECO Metrics
Find out how eco-friendly the components are
Vegan
No
No
Cruelty free
No
No
Reef safe
Yes
Yes
Ozone layer safe
Yes
Yes
Organic score
natural
1 out of 22
5%
chemical
19 out of 22
86%
natural
7 out of 38
18%
chemical
28 out of 38
74%
Concerns
Pay attention to this information
-- Extra information --
Components by Skin Type
Find out what components are good or bad for your skin type
Dry skin
Positive: 0Negative: 0
Oily skin
Positive: 0Negative: 0
Sensitive skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Titanium Dioxide#1
Dry skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Tocopherol#33
Oily skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Zinc Oxide#2
Sensitive skin
Positive: 2Negative: 1
Titanium Dioxide#1Zinc Oxide#2Benzoic Acid#36