Comparison between Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Daily Shampoo vs. Paul Mitchell Shampoo Three
Find out which product is better for your skin.
26 Ingredients 31
1
Water
1
Water
2
Sodium Laureth Sulfate
2
Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
3
Sodium Chloride
3
Sodium Laureth Sulfate
4
Cocamide Mea
4
Urea
5
Hedychium Coronarium
5
Magnesium Sulfate
6
Panthenol
6
Sodium Chloride
7
Triticum Vulgare (Wheat) Germ Oil Unsaponifiables
7
Sodium Thiosulfate
8
Algae/Seaweed/Kelp Extract (Species Unspecified)
8
Glycine
-- Show others --
Uniqueness16 out of 26
61.5%
Uniqueness21 out of 31
67.7%
Positive Effects
Find out what good effects the product has
ECO Metrics
Find out how eco-friendly the components are
Vegan
No
No
Cruelty free
No
No
Reef friendly
Yes
Yes
Ozone layer safe
Yes
Yes
Organic score
natural
9 out of 26
35%
chemical
13 out of 26
50%
natural
8 out of 31
26%
chemical
23 out of 31
74%
Concerns
Pay attention to these components
-- Extra information --
Components by Skin Type
Find out what components are good or bad for your skin type
Dry skin
Positive: 2Negative: 1
Panthenol#6Glycerin#15Sodium Laureth Sulfate#2
Oily skin
Positive: 0Negative: 0
Sensitive skin
Positive: 1Negative: 2
Aloe Barbadensis (Aloe Vera) Leaf Extract#10Citric Acid#16Benzyl Benzoate#26
Dry skin
Positive: 1Negative: 1
Glycine#8Sodium Laureth Sulfate#3
Oily skin
Positive: 0Negative: 1
Sulfated Castor Oil#15
Sensitive skin
Positive: 0Negative: 1
Limonene#31
Detailed view
Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Daily Shampoo vs. Paul Mitchell Shampoo Three
Position 1
Both products have the same component on this position.
#1Water
Origin: natural
Role: Solvent
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
Water is a great solvent. It’s neutral and doesn’t provide any strong positive or negative effects. It just helps components to mix better and to transport active components.
Position 2
#2Sodium Laureth Sulfate
Origin: chemical
Role: Cleansing agent, Emulsifying agent, Surfactant
Cleansing
Sulfates
Comedogenic rating [ 3 ]
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
![Bad for dry skin](https://skinsignal.com/api/web/image/layout/dry_bad.png?w=30&q=50)
Bad for dry skin
-- versus --
#2Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
Origin: chemical
Role: Skin conditioning agent, Cleansing agent, Foam booster, Hair conditioning, Surfactant
Cleansing
Hair conditioning
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ A ]
Position 3
#3Sodium Chloride
Origin: natural
Role: Flavoring agent, Viscosity controlling agent
Antiseptic
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
Sodium Chloride is a very famous ingredeint also known as Salt. Yes, it’s the same salt you can find on your table. In cosmetics, it is used as a preservative helping the product to live longer. It is also used as a peeling agent in different scrubs. Human contact with this element since ancient times and that's why it is 100% safe.
-- versus --
#3Sodium Laureth Sulfate
Origin: chemical
Role: Cleansing agent, Emulsifying agent, Surfactant
Cleansing
Sulfates
Comedogenic rating [ 3 ]
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
![Bad for dry skin](https://skinsignal.com/api/web/image/layout/dry_bad.png?w=30&q=50)
Bad for dry skin
Position 4
#4Cocamide Mea
Origin: chemical
Role: Emulsifying agent, Emulsion stabilizer, Foam booster, Surfactant, Viscosity controlling agent
Softening
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ B ]
-- versus --
#4Urea
Origin: natural
Role: Skin conditioning agent, Antistatic agent, Buffering agent, Humectant
Moisturizing
Soothing
Regeneration
Protection
Hair conditioning
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ A ]
Position 5
#5Hedychium Coronarium
Origin: No information
Role: No information
-- versus --
#5Magnesium Sulfate
Origin: chemical
Role: Bulking agent, Hair conditioning, Viscosity controlling agent
EWG Rating [ 1 ]
CIR Rating [ A ]