Comparison between Forever Bloom Biomimic Foundation SPF 50 vs. Tizo Am Replenish Lightly Tinted SPF 40
- 25 components -
- 16 components -
Find out which product is better for your skin.
Ingredients in both products 5
Components only in Forever Bloom Biomimic Foundation SPF 50 20
Uniqueness: 80.0%
Components only in Tizo Am Replenish Lightly Tinted SPF 40 11
Capric/caprylic Triglyceride, Ceramide 3, Cyclohexasiloxane, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Iron Oxides and 6 more. Show all.
Uniqueness: 68.8%
Face to Face
Components position by position
1
Octinoxate
1
Zinc Oxide
2
Zinc Oxide
2
Capric/caprylic Triglyceride
3
Titanium Dioxide
3
Ceramide 3
4
Water
4
Cyclohexasiloxane
5
Cyclopentasiloxane
5
Cyclopentasiloxane
6
Dimethicone
6
Dimethicone
7
Dimethicone Crosspolymer
7
Dimethicone Crosspolymer
8
Isododecane
8
Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer
Show others
Positive Effects
Find out what good effects the product has
Both products provide the following effects: , UV Protection, Moisturizing, Softening, Nutrifying, Antiseptic, Protection, Hair conditioning, Hair gloss
Effects unique for Bloom Biomimic Foundation SPF 50:
Antistatic, DeodorantEffects unique for Am Replenish Lightly Tinted SPF 40:
Antioxidant, Anti-aging, Lightening-- Show more --
ECO Metrics
Find out how eco-friendly the components are
Vegan
No
No
Cruelty free
No
No
Reef friendly
Yes
Yes
Ozone layer safe
Yes
Yes
Organic score
natural
5 out of 25
20%
chemical
19 out of 25
76%
natural
1 out of 16
6%
chemical
14 out of 16
88%
Concerns
Pay attention to this information
-- Extra information --
Components by Skin Type
Find out what components are good or bad for your skin type
Dry skin
Positive: 0Negative: 0
Oily skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Zinc Oxide#2
Sensitive skin
Positive: 2Negative: 1
Zinc Oxide#2Titanium Dioxide#3Octinoxate#1
Dry skin
Positive: 0Negative: 0
Oily skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Zinc Oxide#1
Sensitive skin
Positive: 1Negative: 0
Zinc Oxide#1
